Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the Supreme Court of Norway, (Norges Høyesterett), received on 5 June 2015 in the case of Holship Norge AS v Norsk Transportarbeiderforbund. 05/06/2015

be further considered here.15 The EFTA Court's recent judgment in the Holship case16 concerning inter alia the relationship between EEA competition law and

The boycott notified in the Norwegian Transport Workers’ Union’s letter of 11/06/2013 to Holship Norge AS is lawful. 2. Advertise for FREE. Free e-news. Subscribe to the magazine The EFTA Court is an independent judicial body, established under the "Surveillance and Court Agreement" (SCA) to ensure judicial oversight of the EEA Agreement in the EEA/EFTA States. It came into operation following the entry into force of the EEA Agreement on 1 January 1994, and it has essentially been modelled on a 1994 version of the European Court of Justice. In May 2017, the First Judicial Summit of the EFTA Pillar was held.

The Holship case – judgment of the Supreme Court On December 16, 2016 the Supreme Court passed a judgement regarding the case between Holship Norge AS and The Transport Workers Union. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Holship Norge AS. The EFTA Court is an independent judicial body, established under the "Surveillance and Court Agreement" (SCA) to ensure judicial oversight of the EEA Agreement in the EEA/EFTA States. It came into operation following the entry into force of the EEA Agreement on 1 January 1994, and it has essentially been modelled on a 1994 version of the European Court of Justice. Holship and Bedriftsforbundet lost their joint appeal against this at the Borgarting Court of Appeal in September 2014. Holship had argued that the boycott was illegal, and that the framework collective agreement was in breach of the competition law and the right … In May 2017, the First Judicial Summit of the EFTA Pillar was held. The Supreme Courts of Iceland and Norway, in corpore, Judges from the three highest courts of Liechtenstein (State Court, Supreme Court and Administrative Court), together with their respective legal secretaries, joined the Judges of the EFTA Court in Luxembourg on the 25th anniversary of the signing of the EEA Agreement in Oporto. EFTA Court decision on Norway dockers could hit EU ports relates to a case that was brought before a Norwegian court in 2013 by Danish freight forwarding and logistics company Holship, which had been threatened with a boycott from dockers’ unions at Drammen port unless it used their dockers.

146 Judgement of the EFTA Court, Holship Norge AS, especially paras 17-23. It criticized the judgment in O. and B. and urged the EFTA Court to depart from it. 279 The coordinated effort in Holship provides another example.

Begäran om ett rådgivande yttrande från Efta-domstolen enligt beslut av norska Arbeidsretten av den 27 september 2000 i målet Landsorganisasjonen i Norge

The Norwegian unions have now brought the matter before the European Court of Human Rights. EFTA Court 1 rue de Fort Tüngen 1--1499 Luxembourg 02.10.2015 CASE E-14/15 HOI-SHIP NORGE AS v NORSK TRANSPORTARBEIDERFORBUND NHO Logistikk og Transport (Norwegian Logistics and Freight Association) is a national Norwegian employers federation, and the counterpart to Norsk Transportarbeideforbund (Norwegian This site allows representatives of the parties to submit, receive and consult procedural documents electronically.!!! Please, do not use Microsoft EDGE or Internet Explorer 11 The decision, issued on 19 April 2016, relates to a case that was brought before a Norwegian court in 2013 by Danish freight forwarding and logistics company Holship, which had been threatened with a boycott from dockers’ unions at Drammen port unless it used their dockers. In LO and in Holship, the EFTA Court dealt with the relationship between collective bargaining and industrial action on the one hand and competition law on the other.

EFTA-domstolen og dens samhandling med de norske domstolene, Lov og Rett (Oslo), 8/2013, 515-534. The EFTA Court and the Court of Justice of the European Union: Coming in Parts But Winning Together, In: The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-law.

9 Aug 2018 He has served as a Judge of the EFTA Court since 1995 and as Sorpa; E-14/ 15 Holship Norge AS v Norsk Transportarbeiderforbund; E-4/15 19 Nov 2017 It was explicitly ascertained by the Supreme Court in 1866.

Holship Norge AS mot Norsk Transportarbeiderforbund. Book 1. NO. However, the Norwegian Supreme Court accepted Holship’s appeal in January 2015.
Hemavan boka skidor

Subscribe to the magazine Court against Holship, declaring that the boycott notified in the letter of 11 June 2013 was lawful. (17) On 19 March 2014, the District Court delivered its judgment with the following conclusion: “1. The boycott notified in the Norwegian Transport Workers’ Union’s letter of 11/06/2013 to Holship Norge AS is lawful. 2.

25/03/2021 Holship, with legal assistance of the Norwegian Business Association, represented by Kvales partner Jan-Erik Sverre and Kvales partner Kristin Valla, succeeded in the EFTA Court in 2015 and the Supreme Court at the end of 2016: The EFTA Court has long held that the EEA Agreement must be ‘interpreted in the light of fundamental rights’Footnote 5and that the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights (‘the Convention’) and the case law of the Strasbourg Court are to be considered, as reiterated in several judgments, ‘important sources’ for the determination of the content of rights under EEA law. EFTA Court Spring Seminar 16 June 2017 WILHELM MATHESON Supreme Court Justice Norway 1.
Sveriges författarfond styrelse

jobb sjukvård stockholm
elkraftverk bensin
pro assistant job description
herrgårdar uppsala län
per levin växjö
seb brygglån ränta
temperatur australien mai

Articles 31, 53 and 54 EEA – Competition law – Collective agreements – Collective action – Freedom of establishment Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the Supreme Court of Norway, (Norges Høyesterett), received on 5 June 2015 in the case of Holship Norge AS v Norsk Transportarbeiderforbund. 05/06/2015

E-4/15. Icelandic Financial Services Association v EFTA Surveillance Authority. Book 1. EN. Case. E-14/15. Holship Norge AS v Norsk Transportarbeiderforbund. Book 1.

Contracting Parties to the Agreement (“the EEA EFTA States”) on the other. This division is necessary European Court of Human Rights (“the ECtHR”) and the EFTA Court. An extensive EFTA Ct. Rep. 4 and Case E-14/15 Holship [2016],.

(17) On 19 March 2014, the District Court delivered its judgment with the following conclusion: “1. The boycott notified in the Norwegian Transport Workers’ Union’s letter of 11/06/2013 to Holship Norge AS is lawful. 2.

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Holship Norge AS. The EFTA Court is an independent judicial body, established under the "Surveillance and Court Agreement" (SCA) to ensure judicial oversight of the EEA Agreement in the EEA/EFTA States. It came into operation following the entry into force of the EEA Agreement on 1 January 1994, and it has essentially been modelled on a 1994 version of the European Court of Justice. Holship and Bedriftsforbundet lost their joint appeal against this at the Borgarting Court of Appeal in September 2014. Holship had argued that the boycott was illegal, and that the framework collective agreement was in breach of the competition law and the right … In May 2017, the First Judicial Summit of the EFTA Pillar was held. The Supreme Courts of Iceland and Norway, in corpore, Judges from the three highest courts of Liechtenstein (State Court, Supreme Court and Administrative Court), together with their respective legal secretaries, joined the Judges of the EFTA Court in Luxembourg on the 25th anniversary of the signing of the EEA Agreement in Oporto. EFTA Court decision on Norway dockers could hit EU ports relates to a case that was brought before a Norwegian court in 2013 by Danish freight forwarding and logistics company Holship, which had been threatened with a boycott from dockers’ unions at Drammen port unless it used their dockers. In LO and in Holship, the EFTA Court dealt with the relationship between collective bargaining and industrial action on the one hand and competition law on the other.